Rural System, Inc.
 Sustained rural lands; sustained profits




Racial Issues
Notes and Guidelines

Rural System, Inc., when operational, will not discriminate against employees, students, or applicants on the basis of race, sex, handicap, age, veteran status, national origin, religion, political affiliation, or sexual orientation.

There are fewer than 2 percent of the population of the Wise and Dickerson Counties that are African Americans.

Rural System has a strong non-discrimination policy.

A 2003 article:
African Americans’ environmental concerns equal to or greater than whites’
The University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment

Contrary to commonly held assumptions, African Americans are as concerned as white Americans – and in some cases more so – about environmental issues.

Paul Mohai, Associate Professor at the University of Michigan’s School of Natural Resources and Environment, is the author of a new study, the first comprehensive examination of the environmental concerns, priorities and actions of African Americans to date.

The study, entitled "Dispelling Old Myths: African American Concern for the Environment," will be published as the cover story of the June 2003 issue of Environment magazine.

"The conventional wisdom is that, due to greater concerns about jobs, crime, education and other ‘survival’ issues, African Americans are unconcerned about the environment," says Mohai. "This study provides clear evidence that conventional wisdom is wrong."

The study draws on national data sets as well as data from the Detroit Metropolitan Area. These include three decades of data from the National Opinion Research Center, U-M Detroit Area Studies from 1990 and 2002, two decades of data from the League of Conservation Voters, and the People of Color Environmental Groups Directory. The study examines not just the environmental attitudes of African Americans but also lifestyle choices, political actions, environmental group memberships, and the environmental voting records of African American legislators.

Among the key findings:

-- African Americans are more likely than white Americans to make lifestyle choices that help protect the environment in the categories of buying pesticide-free foods (37 percent of African Americans versus 29 percent of whites), consuming less meat (15 percent of African Americans versus 8 percent of whites), and driving less (16 percent of African Americans versus 10 percent of whites). However, African Americans are less likely than whites to recycle (44 percent of African Americans versus 64 percent of whites).

-- African Americans are as likely as white Americans to belong to environmental groups. According to a 1993 national survey, ten percent of African Americans and whites belonged to an environmental group. In 2000, nine percent of whites and eight percent of African Americans belonged to an environmental group. However, rather than joining traditional environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club or the World Wildlife Fund, African Americans frequently form their own groups and mobilize on a grassroots level.

-- African Americans express significantly greater concern than whites about their local environment. According to Mohai, this correlates with the poorer environmental quality found in African American neighborhoods. Neighborhood environmental problems, such as high noise levels, abandoned houses, trash, litter, rats, roaches, or other pests were cited as among the most important environmental problems facing the country by 26 percent of African Americans surveyed, compared to only 3 percent of whites.

--African Americans in Congress have been among the strongest and most consistent supporters of environmental protection legislation over the past two decades. Average pro-environmental voting scores for African American members in the House of Representatives have ranged from about 75 percent to 85 percent, while for other House Democrats and for House Republicans average scores have ranged from about 60 percent to 80 percent and 20 percent to 40 percent, respectively. "Environmental issues are not ‘luxury’ issues to African Americans," says Mohai.

"Survey results such as these demonstrate that environmental quality issues are a priority on many different levels."

"Environment" is a peer-reviewed magazine written by authoritative scientists and policymakers, yet it is accessible to a more general audience. It is published by Heldref Publications, the publishing division of the non-profit Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation, based in Washington, D.C. (www.heldref.org).

The University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment supports the protection of the Earth’s resources and the achievement of a sustainable society. Faculty and students strive to generate knowledge, develop innovative policies and refine new techniques through research and education (www.snre.umich.edu).

Capturing Cultural Value [pdf]

Various policy analysts, politicians, and other persons have become increasingly intrigued by the potential that various cultural programs and initiatives may have in terms of economic development in their respective regions. This report, authored by John Holden on behalf of the Demos Group in London, examines the way in which government views the potential benefits of various cultural programs. In this 62-page report, Holden argues that arts and other such programs should be funded because of their cultural contribution to society, rather than for the increasingly popular reason given by many units of governance, which is that they can effectively deliver government policy. The report goes on to argue that government should move from a target-oriented, top-down approach to one that is more cognizant of the full range of values created by culture.March 2005


Who Owns Land? Agricultural Land Ownership by Race/Ethnicity, by Jess Gilbert, Spencer D. Wood, and Gwen Sharp, provides the most recent and thorough national data on the racial/ethnic dimensions of agricultural land ownership in the United States, based on the USDA's Agricultural Economics and Land Ownership Survey of 1999. To download the article, go to the USDA web site

http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ruralamerica/ra174/ra174h.pdf


Rural System Staff seek in various ways to be responsive to the needs of native people. They seek, to the extent practicable, to accommodate access to and ceremonial use of Indian sacred sites by native people religious practitioners and to avoid adversely affecting the physical integrity of such sacred sites. Where appropriate, we to the fullest extent possible, attempt to maintain the confidentiality of sacred sites. In formulating policies significantly or uniquely affecting Indian and native people tribalgovernments, we shall be guided by principles of respect for Tribal self-government and sovereignty, for Tribal treaty and other rights, and for responsibilities that arise from the unique legal relationship between local governments and Indian Tribal governments.

Rural System will attempt to gain advice from federally recognized Indian Tribes and Tribal governments in land management planning.

Perhaps you will share ideas with me
about some of the topic(s) above at

RHGiles@RuralSystem.com.

Maybe we can work together
... for the good of us all
... for a long time.

Return to the top of page.

Last revision, March 4, 2005